JUMP TO PIERRE POILIEVRE’S VOTING RECORD // JUMP TO SHAREABLE GRAPHICS
Pierre Poilievre speaks with conviction. “We’re Conservatives,” he says. “We don’t imagine in large fats authorities packages. We don’t imagine in giving cash.”
At first, which may sound like odd political discuss. However these phrases are greater than slogans. They’re alerts. They draw strains between who’s deserving of help, and who will not be. Between who counts, and who’s left behind.
When somebody in search of to steer this nation repeatedly tells us what they don’t imagine in, we should ask: what values are left? What sort of future is being supplied and for whom?
This isn’t about fiscal restraint. It’s about stripping away the techniques that many people depend on to outlive and thrive. It’s about making life tougher for individuals navigating poverty, housing precarity, continual sickness, incapacity, single parenthood, systemic racism, colonial legacies, gender-based violence. After which telling them it’s their fault.
Poilievre obtained a authorities pension on the age of 31. Later, he tried to focus on different MPs over their pensions in a public stunt. The fact? His personal pension is roughly 3 times bigger, projected to be round $230,000 yearly by the point he turns 65. That quantity will solely develop if he turns into Prime Minister. Quickly after securing his pension, he voted to increase the retirement age for others to 67. He speaks of independence and “the worth of exhausting work,” however solely applies these values to communities who’ve been denied truthful entry to alternatives for generations. In 2008, he questioned whether or not survivors of residential faculties ought to obtain compensation, arguing as a substitute that Indigenous peoples simply have to “work tougher.” In 2023, he addressed a bunch that claimed the harms of residential faculties have been a “fantasy.”
This isn’t only a political place. It’s an erasure of fact. It’s a refusal to reckon with Canada’s historical past and its ongoing impacts.
And it’s half of a bigger sample. When Bernie Sanders tells individuals to “Pay attention to not what they are saying, watch what they do,” that applies right here, too. So let’s check out Pierre’s report, we could?
Pierre’s Report
Poilievre has persistently voted in opposition to helps that assist individuals meet primary wants: inexpensive housing, childcare, dental care, remedy, contraceptives, and meals packages in faculties. He’s opposed increasing the pension plan, elevating the minimal wage, strengthening employees’ rights, and defending the environment.
When communities wanted pandemic aid, he referred to as these helps wasteful. “We don’t imagine in giving cash,” he stated. However that’s not true. He believes in directing cash to those that have already got wealth – actual property builders, grocery magnates, long-term care firms. His inside circle contains lobbyists for billion-dollar corporations and donors who host him in mansions throughout the nation.
So the query isn’t whether or not authorities spending is nice or unhealthy. The query is: who does he imagine is value investing in?
He has constructed a platform by demonizing trans and non-binary individuals, erasing gender variety, and selling anti-2SLGBTQIA+ rhetoric. He’s given area to these who oppose reproductive justice, and opened the door to laws that will management our our bodies. He supported banning niqabs. He posed with “Straight Satisfaction” t-shirts throughout Satisfaction. He talks of “radical gender ideology” as if our proper to exist safely is up for debate,. whereas concluding that “wokeism” has “reinserted and invented” racism in Canada.
These aren’t unintended moments. They’re deliberate methods of exclusion. They distract, divide, and dehumanize.
Pierre Poilievre isn’t just rejecting authorities packages – he’s rejecting the thought of collective care. He’s rejecting the precept that society has a duty to make sure that each individual, irrespective of their earnings, gender, race, means, or background, can stay with dignity and chance.
And but, he presents himself because the voice of the “frequent individual.” However the individuals whose lives are most affected by his insurance policies – the only mother looking for childcare, the younger individual navigating systemic racism, the employee pressured to decide on between lease and medicine, the trans teen in search of security – are not included in his model of Canada. And when requested on to make clear which social packages he’ll remove, he persistently refuses to reply the query.
This isn’t about left versus proper. That is about whose lives are made tougher by coverage selections that deal with care as a luxurious. It’s about whether or not we imagine that being housed, fed, affirmed, and secure are rights or rewards that just some are allowed to earn.
Canada is being requested to decide on.
Do we wish a future that punishes individuals for needing help?
Or one which uplifts us all?
Do we wish a society constructed on shortage, disgrace, and suspicion?
Or one grounded in care, justice, and interdependence?
Pierre Poilievre is betting on the politics of resentment. However there may be one other method. One which sees each individual as inherently worthy. One which understands that the measure of a rustic will not be the way it treats essentially the most highly effective, however the way it helps these dealing with the best limitations.
This can be a time to be daring. To reject false selections. To prepare, to vote, to think about.
When somebody tells you, “we don’t imagine in giving cash,” ask your self: Who’s “we”? Who’s being unnoticed? And what sort of Canada are we keen to struggle for?
As a result of the longer term will not be written but. And it doesn’t belong to Pierre Poilievre. It belongs to all of us.
Pierre’s Voting Report & Political Profession
Record format is beneath the chart // Shareable graphics beneath record
| YEAR | VOTED AGAINST | VOTED FOR | STATEMENT |
| 2004 | Elevating the federal minimal wage Invoice C-48 federal anti-scab laws – from 2004 to 2023 (voted 8 instances in opposition to it) |
||
| 2005 | Outlined marriage as a union between ‘one man and one ladies t the exclusion of all others” | ||
| 2006 | Invoice C-31, An Act respecting value of residing aid measures associated to dental care and rental housing housing inexpensive and deal with Canada’s housing disaster |
||
| 2007 | |||
| 2008 | Stated Indigenous Peoples wanted to be taught the worth of exhausting work greater than they wanted compensation for residential faculties | ||
| 2009 | Invoice C-31, An Act respecting value of residing aid measures associated to dental care and rental housing housing inexpensive and deal with Canada’s housing disaster |
Used the time period ‘tar child’ within the Home of Commons | |
| 2010 | Invoice C-31, An Act respecting value of residing aid measures associated to dental care and rental housing housing inexpensive and deal with Canada’s housing disaster |
Acquired a authorities pension at 31. | |
| 2011 | |||
| 2012 | Elevated the age of eligibility for Outdated Age Safety (OAS) and the Assured Revenue Complement (GIS) from 65 to 67
Supported C-377 and C-525 payments, which tried to bury unions |
Help for eliminating reliable outlined advantages pensions and changing them with inferior plans that take all the danger off banks and managers and put it on the backs of employees – Pooled Registered Pension Plan (PRPP) employer participation and contributions are voluntary.
43.5 billion lower to healthcare funding |
|
| 2013 | Invoice C-31, An Act respecting value of residing aid measures associated to dental care and rental housing housing inexpensive and deal with Canada’s housing disaster |
Invoice C-377 – An Act to amend the Revenue Tax Act (labour organizations): The invoice required unions to publicly disclose detailed monetary info, together with salaries, bills, and political actions—seen extensively as an try to undermine union autonomy. | Labored to carry American-style anti-union legal guidelines to Canada |
| 2014 | Invoice C-31, An Act respecting value of residing aid measures associated to dental care and rental housing housing inexpensive and deal with Canada’s housing disaster |
Launched the truthful election motion, which aimed to make it tougher for Canadians to vote
Invoice C-525 – Staff’ Voting Rights Act: It made it tougher to unionize by changing card-check certification with a compulsory secret poll vote—making it simpler for employers to discourage unionization. |
Pierre promoted permitting employers to desert the pension they promised to employees |
| 2015 | Tax cuts for the working center class (Invoice C-2) | Promoted a ‘niqab ban’ | |
| 2016 | enlargement of the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), essentially the most important enchancment to Canada’s public pension system in 50 years
Canada Youngster Profit – The CCB changed the earlier Common Youngster Care Profit (UCCB). Poilievre opposed the change, criticizing it for being redistributive and framed it as a part of “large authorities.” |
||
| 2017 | Massive donors are actual property buyers: Richard Abboud, the CEO of an REIT referred to as Discussion board Asset Administration is listed as donating $7,875 to the federal Conservative get together since 2017, in line with Elections Canada information. | ||
| 2018 | Invoice C-31, An Act respecting value of residing aid measures associated to dental care and rental housing housing inexpensive and deal with Canada’s housing disaster |
||
| 2019 | Invoice C-31, An Act respecting value of residing aid measures associated to dental care and rental housing housing inexpensive and deal with Canada’s housing disaster |
||
| 2020 | Talked down pandemic helps that helped thousands and thousands of Canadians pay their payments in the course of the disaster | ||
| 2021 | a ten% enhance to the Outdated Age Safety pension for these aged 75 and above
$10-a-day youngster care program |
Known as youngster care a ‘slush fund,’ and tried to chop packages that help the center class | |
| 2022 | Tax-free first dwelling financial savings account (invoice C-19)
Dental care Invoice C-31 |
Used misogynist YouTube tags to court docket far-right supporters
Inspired Canadians to ‘opt-out on inflation’ with risky crypto-currencies |
|
| 2023 | A proposed $196.1 billion funding bundle geared toward decreasing surgical procedure and emergency room wait instances. This funding was meant to deal with important backlogs and enhance affected person care throughout the nation. |
Adopted the American far-right playbook to make use of anti 2sLGBTQI+ language
Pushed an anti-vaccine agenda Dedicated to free votes, permitting his MP to carry ahead anti-abortion laws Supported unlawful convoy blockades Delivered a speech to a bunch that claimed it was a “fantasy” that residential faculties robbed Indigenous youngsters of their childhood Posed with somebody sporting a ‘straight pleasure’ shirt throughout Satisfaction season |
|
| 2024 | Taxing the wealthy by opposing elevating the capital features inclusion fee
Help for Ukraine Nationwide Faculty Meals Program – The 2024 federal price range included important funding in a nationwide college meals program. Poilievre has publicly criticized it and has not dedicated to supporting it. Invoice-C24 – an act respecting pharmacare – free diabetes remedy. Petition e-4516 without cost entry to prescription contraceptives throughout Canada. |
Visited and courted far-right extremist teams
Stated he’d use the however clause, overriding Canadian’s rights Introduced his intention to remove the federal Housing Accelerator Fund if elected as Prime Minister. He criticized the fund, stating that it was ineffective and contributed to elevated paperwork, thereby hindering housing building. |
|
| 2025 | Poilievre said he’s solely conscious of two genders and that loos must be solely for males or for girls, whereas additionally saying that the federal government shouldn’t contain itself in questions of gender id. |
VOTED AGAINST:
- Invoice C-31, An Act respecting value of residing aid measures associated to dental care and rental housing
- Inexpensive housing and addressing Canada’s housing disaster (2006, 2009, 2010, 2013, 2014, 2018 and 2019)
- Invoice C-48 Elevating the federal minimal wage (2004)
- Invoice C-2 Tax cuts for the working center class (2015)
- Invoice C-64 Free diabetes remedy
- Invoice C-19 Tax-free first dwelling financial savings account (2022)
- e-4516 Free Contraceptives
- $10-a-day youngster care
- Dental care
- The Nationwide Faculty Meals Program
- The Canada Youngster Profit
- Pharmacare
- Voted 8 instances in opposition to federal anti-scab laws (2004-2023)
- In 20 years as a MP, he has voted in opposition to defending the atmosphere 400 instances
- Voted in opposition to enlargement of the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), essentially the most important enchancment to Canada’s public pension system in 50 years (2016)
- Voted in opposition to a ten% enhance to the Outdated Age Safety pension for these aged 75 and above (2021)
- Voted in opposition to taxing the wealthy by opposing elevating the capital features inclusion charges (2024)
- Backed daycare
- Similar-sex marriage
- Stronger gun management
WHAT HE’S FOR:
- Voted for $43.5 billion lower to healthcare funding
- Voted for $196.1 billion lower to funds for surgical procedure and emergency room wait instances
- As Housing Minister in Stephen Harper’s Conservative authorities, he allowed $800,000 inexpensive rental items to be offered off to company landlords and builders.
- Voted to extend the age of eligibility for Outdated Age Safety (OAS) and the Assured Revenue Complement (GIS) from 65 to 67 (2012)
- Pierre promoted permitting employers to desert the pension they promised to employees
- Supported mountaineering the retirement age from 65-67
- Supported C-377 and C-525 payments, which tried to bury unions
- Supported eliminating reliable outlined advantages pensions and changing them with inferior plans that take all the danger off banks and managers and put it on the backs of employees, substitute with Pooled Registered Pension Plan (PRPP) employer participation and contributions are voluntary
- Outlined marriage as a union between ‘one man and one ladies t the exclusion of all others” (2005)
- Stated Indigenous Peoples wanted to be taught the worth of exhausting work greater than they wanted compensation for residential faculties (2008) – “are we actually getting worth for all of this cash” worth of exhausting work, independence and self-reliance
- Labored to carry American-style anti-union legal guidelines to Canada (2013)
- Made it tougher for Canadians to vote (2014) by introducing the Truthful Election Act
- Promoted a ‘niqab ban’ (2015) “not going to succumb to political correctness as a way to accommodate a observe that it’s not aligned with Canadian values”
- Adopted the American far-right playbook to make use of anti 2sLGBTQI+ language (2023) – radical gender ideology on youngsters – woke gender ideology imposed on our youngsters – radical gender ideology – faith of gender ideology, proponents of radical gender ideology.
- Known as youngster care a ‘slush fund,’ and tried to chop packages that help the center class (2021)
- Inspired Canadians to ‘opt-out on inflation’ with risky crypto-currencies (2022)
- Used misogynist YouTube tags to court docket far-right supporters (2022) – males going their very own method: time period coined by misogynistic males who attempt to lower ladies fully out of their lives
- Pushed an anti-vaccine agenda (2023)
- Dedicated to free votes, permitting his MP to carry ahead anti-abortion laws (2023) endorsed by an anti-choice group. Interview with Jordan Peterson was sponsored by an anti-choice group.
- Supported unlawful convoy blockades (2023) calling them “cheerful, patriotic, optimistic Canadians”
- Delivered a speech to a bunch that claimed it was a “fantasy” that residential faculties robbed Indigenous youngsters of their childhood (2023)
- Visited and courted far-right extremist teams corresponding to Diagolon (2022-2024)
- Turned his again on Ukraine (2024) – voted in opposition to help
- Stated he’d use the however clause, overriding Canadian’s rights (2024)
- Talked down pandemic helps that helped thousands and thousands of Canadians pay their payments in the course of the disaster (2020) “we’re conservatives we don’t imagine in that”, we “don’t imagine in large fats authorities packages”
- Posed with somebody sporting a ‘straight pleasure’ shirt throughout Satisfaction season (2023)
- Used the time period ‘tar child’ within the Home of Commons (2009)
- Terminated the federal Housing Accelerator Fund, slicing billions of {dollars} from housing building and making it tougher for municipalities to construct extra properties.
- In January 2025, Poilievre said he’s solely conscious of two genders and expressed that the federal government shouldn’t contain itself in questions of gender id.
- Has publicly said that he’ll defund the CBC
- Massive donors are actual property buyers: Richard Abboud, the CEO of an REIT referred to as Discussion board Asset Administration is listed as donating $7,875 to the federal Conservative get together since 2017, in line with Elections Canada information.
- Poilievre’s chief strategist is a lobbyist for Galen Weston and Loblaws
- His deputy chief lobbied to guard a for-profit long-term care firm that noticed report earnings and excessive fatalities in the course of the pandemic
- His caucus chair is the chairman of a serious grocery chain
SHARABLES
